MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058269464 · doi:10.5539/jel.v2n3p39

School-Based Management with or without Instructional Leadership: Experience from Sweden

2013· article· en· W2058269464 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erik Lindberg, Vladimir Vanyushyn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstructional leadershipPsychologyPerceptionEducational leadershipPedagogyMathematics educationApplied psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study sets out to examine schools principals’ perception of the importance of school-based management(SBM) and instructional leadership tasks and their assessment of the performance of those tasks in Swedishupper secondary schools. A review of the literature on SBM and instructional leadership results in a list of twentyone tasks grouped into administrative, firefighting, and instructional leadership. Analysis of the survey responsesfrom 234 principals shows that 80% of administrative and 75% of firefighting tasks were seen as highlyimportant and performed well, while 68% of instructional leadership tasks were perceived as of having lowerimportance and performance. Implications for school principals and policy-makers are discussed and venues forfuture research are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education and LearningSame topicTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesFrench-language works237,207