MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058278861 · doi:10.3917/rsi.106.0032

Qu'en est-il de l'éclairage à l'unité néonatale ?

2011· article· fr· W2058278861 on OpenAlexaff
Valérie Lebel, Marilyn Aita

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche en soins infirmiers · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’éclairage est un élément important de l’environnement dans lequel le nouveau-né prématuré poursuit son développement. Bien que différents chercheurs se soient intéressés à ce domaine de recherche, la divergence des résultats scientifiques et des recommandations limite la généralisation des résultats de ces études pour guider la pratique clinique en néonatalogie. Alors que les pratiques infirmières se basent sur les résultats probants et les recommandations d’organismes influents, il est essentiel d’être sensibilisés aux éléments contenus au sein des écrits scientifiques traitant de l’éclairage à l’unité néonatale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche en soins infirmiersSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207