In vivo protein-DNA interactions at the kinin B1 receptor gene promoter: No modification on interleukin-1 beta or lipopolysaccharide induction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The kinin B(1) receptor (B(1)R) gene is strongly upregulated following tissue injury and inflammation. In an attempt to define the regulatory elements that account for the control of B(1)R gene expression, we have conducted in vivo footprinting analysis of the B(1)R gene promoter region in three human cell types: embryonic lung fibroblast cells (IMR-90), embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293), and primary cultures of vascular umbilical smooth muscle cells. Initial in vitro delineation of the B(1)R gene promoter by transient transfection experiments with a reporter gene indicated that a 1.4-kb region, located just upstream of the transcription initiation site, bears all the characteristics of a core promoter with a functional TATA box and additional positive and negative control elements, as some of them could be tissue-specific. In vivo ultraviolet and dimethylsulfate footprinting analyses of the 1.4-kb region revealed no difference between the footprint patterns in the three cell types studied. We found that even in the noninduced state, the B(1)R gene promoter is possibly bound by several sequence-specific DNA binding proteins (GATA-1, PEA3, AP-1, CAAT, Sp1, Pit-1a, Oct-1, CREB). Some other footprints were detected on sequences that do not correspond to any known transcription factor binding site. No additional changes in protein-DNA complexes were observed upon treatment with interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta) or bacterial lipopolysaccharide, shown previously to induce B(1)R gene expression. These results indicate that complex protein-DNA interactions exist at the B(1)R gene promoter prior to induction by external stimuli even in cells (HEK-293) that do not express a functional B(1)R.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".