MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058317938 · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/167

THE DISTANCES OF SNR W41 AND OVERLAPPING H II REGIONS

2007· article· en· W2058317938 on OpenAlexaff
D. A. Leahy, W. W. Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalactic planePhysicsRadial velocityMolecular cloudLine (geometry)AstrophysicsKinematicsSpectral lineAstronomyGalaxyGeometryStarsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New H i images from the VLA Galactic Plane Survey show prominent absorption features associated with the supernovae remnant G23.3–0.3 (SNR W41). We highlight the H i absorption spectra and the 13 CO emission spectra of eight small regions on the face of W41, including four H ii regions, three non-thermal emission regions, and one unclassified region. The maximum velocity of absorption for W41 is 78 ± 2 km s −1 and the CO cloud at radial velocity 95 ± 5 km s −1 is behind W41. Because an extended TeV source, a diffuse X-ray enhancement, and a large molecular cloud at radial velocity 77 ± 5 km s −1 overlap the center of W41, the kinematic distance is 3.9–4.5 kpc for W41. For the H ii regions, our analysis shows that both G23.42–0.21 and G23.07+0.25 are at the far kinematic distances (∼9.9 kpc and ∼10.6 kpc, respectively) of their recombination-line velocities (103 ± 0.5 km s −1 and 89.6 ± 2.1 km s −1 , respectively), G23.07–0.37 is at the near kinematic distance (4.4 ± 0.3 kpc) of its recombination-line velocity (82.7 ± 2.0 km s −1 ), and G23.27–0.27 is probably at the near kinematic distance (4.1 ± 0.3 kpc) of its recombination-line velocity (76.1 ± 0.6 km s −1 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207