MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058323366 · doi:10.1021/ie071437j

Optimization of Batch Operating Policies. Part II. Incorporating Process Constraints and Industrial Applications

2008· article· en· W2058323366 on OpenAlexaff
Salvador García‐Muñoz, John F. MacGregor, Debashis Neogi, Bruce E. Latshaw, Sanjay Mehta

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnivariateBatch processingProcess (computing)Computer scienceQuality (philosophy)Product (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)Process engineeringPartial least squares regressionSeries (stratigraphy)Batch reactorMultivariate statisticsMathematical optimizationMathematicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the first part of this series [ Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 7856−7866], data-driven approaches, based on partial least squares (PLS) models built from historical batch data, were used to find optimal batch operating trajectories that would yield a desired vector of final product quality attributes. The method allowed for the inclusion of univariate and multivariate constraints on the set of desired final product quality attributes and presented approaches for handling multiple solutions. In this paper, the technology is further extended to include constraints in the process operating trajectories themselves. The methodology is successfully applied to an industrial batch polymerization process where the batch trajectories are designed to achieve specific properties of the final polymer while consuming the minimal amount of time for the batch run.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207