Dogmas and controversies in the handling of nitrogenous wastes: Ammonia tolerance in the oriental weatherloach<i>Misgurnus anguillicaudatus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oriental weatherloach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus is an extremely ammonia-tolerant fish. Many ammonia-protection mechanisms have been reported in this fish. Six strategies used by this fish to deal with the problem of excess ammonia are described. The fish can (1) reduce ammonia production through reduction in protein and/or amino acid catabolism; (2) reduce ammonia production and obtain energy through partial amino acid catabolism leading to alanine formation; (3) detoxify ammonia to glutamine; (4) tolerate very high ammonia levels in its tissues; (5) get rid of ammonia as NH(3) gas and, probably, (6) possesses background K(+) channels that are impermeable to NH(4)(+). The effects of extracellular ammonia on the contraction performance of the heart from this fish were found to be the same as in rainbow trout, an ammonia-sensitive fish. It suggests that the hearts of most, if not all, fish species are protected against ammonia. MK-801, an NMDA receptor blocker, was found to have a protective effect against ammonia intoxication in the oriental weatherloach, which suggests that the NMDA receptor, as in mammals, is involved in ammonia toxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".