MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058401161 · doi:10.2118/170176-ms

Effects of Pressure Decline Rate on the Post-CHOPS Cyclic Solvent Injection Process

2014· article· en· W2058401161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersPetroleum Technology Research Centre
KeywordsResidual oilVolumetric flow rateSaturation (graph theory)Petroleum engineeringProduction rateEnvironmental sciencePetroleumOil productionSolventPulp and paper industryMaterials scienceChemistryMechanicsGeologyMathematicsProcess engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cyclic Solvent Injection (CSI) has been proposed as a follow-up process in post-CHOPS reservoirs. The oil recovery factor, which could reach over 50% in lab-scale, is mainly attributed to solution gas drive and foamy oil flow in CSI process. It has been suggested that pressure decline rate has impact on the behavior of solution gas drive and foamy oil flow in cold heavy oil production. However, the role of pressure decline rate in the post-CHOPS CSI process production has not been studied adequately. This work was intended to evaluate the effects of pressure decline rate in CSI process under post-CHOPS reservoirs' conditions. In this study, different pressure decline rate tests were conducted in a large cylindrical sand-pack model with a length of 30.48 and a diameter of 15.24. Single well was applied and connected with a mimic wormhole. In terms of oil recovery factor, the average recovery factor of each cycle increases with the increasing pressure decline rate. But considering the running time, the tests with smaller pressure decline rates showed better total recoveries compared with the tests with larger pressure decline rates. And the residual oil saturation pictures showed that the oil far away from the wellbore could be more easily recovered when a smaller pressure decline rate is applied. In terms of oil production rate, the CSI process production can be typically divided into two phases. In Phase 1, the production rate increases and reaches to the maximum value. In Phase 2, the production rate significantly declines. It was found that the test with a larger pressure decline rate had the higher production rate in Phase 1, while the test with the smaller pressure decline rate had the longest production time in Phase 1. The production rate hardly has dependence on the pressure decline rate in Phase 2. This indicated that for an optimized CSI process the pressure decline rate should be dynamically adjusted in order to have the best performance. The results also suggested that the minimum production pressure exists, below which no oil or marginal amount of oil was produced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it