MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058402591 · doi:10.1021/cr9000176

Medicinal Inorganic Chemistry Approaches to Passivation and Removal of Aberrant Metal Ions in Disease

2009· review· en· W2058402591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCitationPhoneLibrary scienceChemistryWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTMedicinal Inorganic Chemistry Approaches to Passivation and Removal of Aberrant Metal Ions in DiseaseLauren E. Scott and Chris Orvig*View Author Information Medicinal Inorganic Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Mailing address: University of British Columbia, 2036 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada. Phone: (604) 822-4449. Fax: (604) 822-2847. E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 10, 4885–4910Publication Date (Web):July 28, 2009Publication History Received15 January 2009Published online28 July 2009Published inissue 14 October 2009https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr9000176https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9000176review-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2009 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views6754Altmetric-Citations275LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Ions,Iron,Mechanisms of action,Metals,Therapeutics Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it