Masculinité, pauvreté et réadaptation cardiaque : le fardeau des hommes qui occupent des métiers de la route1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette note de recherche propose une réflexion sociologique sur la santé cardiovasculaire, la pauvreté et l’occupation professionnelle des hommes socio-économiquement défavorisés. Elle est alimentée principalement par une étude qualitative du rapport au corps de 11 hommes qui souffrent de maladies cardiaques et qui occupent des métiers de la route. En employant l’approche socioculturelle de Pierre Bourdieu, les résultats de cette analyse permettent de mieux comprendre l’impact des conditions socioéconomiques et du genre sur les pratiques de santé et approfondissent les connaissances sur les obstacles à la réadaptation cardiaque qui peuvent être engendrés par l’occupation professionnelle. Les conclusions contribuent à documenter l’importance des facteurs sociopolitiques sur la santé et les styles de vie des individus aux prises avec des maladies chroniques, et à rappeler la pertinence des politiques de santé adaptées aux travailleurs et aux conditions de travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".