MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conjugation of isometamidium chloride to antibodies and the use of the conjugate against the haemoflagellate, <i>Cryptobia salmositica</i> Katz, 1951: an immuno‐chemotherapeutic strategy

2001· article· en· W2058430489 on OpenAlexaff
Bernadette F. Ardelli, Patrick T. K. Woo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Diseases · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCoccidia and coccidiosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersWashington State University
KeywordsPolyclonal antibodiesBiologyMonoclonal antibodyVirologyMicrobiologyAntibodyMonoclonalIn vitroImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The trypanocidal drug isometamidium chloride (Samorin) was conjugated to polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies produced against the pathogenic haemoflagellate Cryptobia salmositica . Under in vitro conditions the unconjugated drug normally accumulates rapidly in the kinetoplast in the parasite; however, once it was conjugated to antibodies (either polyclonal or monoclonal) it was found throughout the parasite. Isometamidium conjugated to polyclonal antibodies lysed C. salmositica under in vitro conditions, but parasites were not agglutinated. In contrast, isometamidium conjugated to monoclonal antibodies (against a 200 kDa surface membrane glycoprotein) did not lyse C. salmositica , but parasites were agglutinated. Because of the low efficacy of the monoclonal conjugate against the parasite in vitro , its cryptobiocidal effect was not evaluated further. The infectivity of C. salmositica (incubated either in culture medium or whole blood) was reduced in fish after in vitro exposure to isometamidium conjugated to polyclonal antibodies. Parasitaemias were reduced in infected chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, after treatment with isometamidium conjugated to polyclonal antibodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish DiseasesSame topicCoccidia and coccidiosis researchFrench-language works237,207