MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The protein kinase Pho85 is required for asymmetric accumulation of the Ash1 protein in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

2001· article· en· W2058445418 on OpenAlexaff
Helen J. McBride, Anita Sil, Vivien Measday, Yaxin Yu, Jason Moffat, Mary E. Maxon, Ira Herskowitz, Brenda Andrews, David J. Stillman

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsBiologyCell biologyTranscription factorCytokinesisCell divisionMutantAsymmetric cell divisionGeneticsCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ash1 protein is a daughter cell-specific repressor of HO gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Both ASH1 mRNA and protein are localized to the incipient daughter cell at the end of mitosis; Ash1 then inhibits HO transcription in the daughter cell after cytokinesis. Mother cells, in contrast, contain little or no Ash1 and thus are able to transcribe HO. We show that deletion of PHO85, which encodes a cyclin-dependent protein kinase, causes reduced transcription of HO and that this reduction is dependent on ASH1. In pho85 mutants, Ash1 protein is no longer asymmetrically localized and is present, instead, in both mother and daughter cells. Initially, it appears to be localized properly but then persists as daughter cells mature into mother cells. In contrast, ASH1 mRNA is localized appropriately to daughter cells in pho85 mutants. We observe that Ash1 protein is phosphorylated by Pho85 in vitro and that Ash1 stability increases in a pho85 mutant. These data suggest that phosphorylation of Ash1 by Pho85 governs stability of Ash1 protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207