MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058449105 · doi:10.7202/006509ar

La scission politique du féminisme international sur la question du “ trafic des femmes ”

2003· article· fr· W2058449105 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Louise Toupin

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article donne un aperçu de l’argumentation qui met en lumière et différencie les principales coalitions internationales féministes luttant contre ce qui est couramment appelé le « trafic des femmes ». L’argumentation mise en évidence ne touche que la définition du phénomène et le différend qui sépare les coalitions sur le sujet, ainsi que leurs stratégies respectives pour l’éradiquer. L’auteure souligne en conclusion certains tangentes du féminisme radical qui, à son avis, se voient désormais remises en cause à l’occasion du débat sur les migrations des femmes. Ce débat entraînera-t-il, à son tour, se demande-t-elle, la migration d’un certain féminisme radical ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207