MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058472163 · doi:10.1039/a905816h

Mercury speciation by capillary gas chromatography with radiofrequency hollow cathode glow discharge atomic emission detection

2000· article· en· W2058472163 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
N�stor Guillermo Orellana Velado, Rosario Pereiro, Alfredo Sanz‐Medel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsChemistryGlow dischargeAtomic emission spectroscopyMercury (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Gas chromatographyDetection limitAnalyteAtomic absorption spectroscopyAtomic spectroscopyCertified reference materialsCathodeChromatographyPlasmaInductively coupled plasmaSpectroscopyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hollow cathode (HC) glow discharge (GD) atomic emission spectrometry (AES) with a radiofrequency (rf) source was investigated as a detector in gas chromatography (GC) for elemental speciation of methylmercury, ethylmercury and inorganic mercury following a Grignard derivatisation reaction (butylmagnesium chloride). The HC design and the transfer line between the source and the GC column are described; in addition, the parameters governing the discharge (pressure, He flow rate, rf power) on the emission of the analytes were optimised. The analytical performance characteristics of this hyphenated technique were evaluated and compared with those of other more common plasmas used as atomic detectors in GC. The absolute detection limits were found to be 0.2, 0.2 and 0.3 pg for methylmercury, ethylmercury and inorganic mercury, respectively, with the variability being lower than 8% RSD at the 10 pg level. Finally, the accuracy of the proposed methodology was successfully tested by analysing two certified reference materials from the National Research Council of Canada (DORM-2 and DOLT-2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometrySame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207