MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058493409 · doi:10.1029/00eo00050

Substorm expansion onset mechanism debated

2000· article· en· W2058493409 on OpenAlex
A. T. Y. Lui, W. Baumjohann, G. Rostoker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetosphereSubstormSolar windGeomagnetic stormSpace weatherStormPhysicsAtmospheric sciencesGeophysicsEquatorMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceMagnetic fieldLatitudeAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Earth is a giant magnet bathed in the solar wind, a continuous and highly variable stream of hot ionized gas that blasts away from the Sun at supersonic speeds. The resulting interaction confines the Earths magnetic field largely to a comet‐shaped volume known as the magnetosphere. When the interaction is strong, the strength of the Earth's magnetic field at the equator can decrease by as much as 1%, marking the period of a magnetic storm that can last for many days. Within a magnetic storm period, intervals of transient activity also occur, with each lasting typically 1–3 hours. These active intervals also occur outside storm periods and are referred to as substorms. The forecasting of these disturbances storms and substorms is a major goal in space weather research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it