MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058496767 · doi:10.4161/cc.10.19.17178

The Fanconi anemia pathway is downregulated upon macrophage differentiation through two distinct mechanisms

2011· article· en· W2058496767 on OpenAlexaff
Wei-Ting Lu, Kimon Lemonidis, Ross M. Drayton, Thierry Nouspikel

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsFANCD2BiologyFanconi anemiaDNA repairDNA damageDownregulation and upregulationHomologous recombinationGenome instabilityCell biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fanconi anaemia (FA) pathway is a DNA-damage inducible pathway critical for genomic stability. FA patients typically display high cancer susceptibility and hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents such as cross-linkers and ionizing radiation. A key step in the activation of the FA pathway is monoubiquitination of the FancD2 protein. Here we report that the FA pathway is downregulated by two distinct mechanisms upon differentiation of THP-1 and HL-60 leukaemia cells into macrophages. Firstly, qRT-PCR analysis revealed a transcriptional downregulation of most components of the FA complex, including FancD2. Secondly, DNA damage-induced monoubiquitination of the remaining FancD2 became deficient at various stages of differentiation depending on the type of damage. This was attributed to the differentiation-induced downregulation of Chk1, which phosphorylates FancD2 as a prelude to its ubiquitination. Although Western blotting revealed that levels of FancD2 were greatly reduced in terminally differentiated macrophages and that FancD2 ubiquitination was abolished, double-strand breaks were proficiently repaired, likely through an increase in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). It has been suggested that the FA pathway promotes repair of double-strand breaks via homologous recombination rather than NHEJ. Its downregulation in macrophages may thus be required to avoid promoting a repair mechanism that is inefficient in post-mitotic cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207