MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058506610 · doi:10.1021/om050840s

Combined Car−Parrinello QM/MM Dynamic Study on the Propagation and Termination Steps of Ethylene Polymerization Catalyzed by [Cp<sub>2</sub>ZrR(μ-Me)B(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (R = Me, Pr)

2006· article· en· W2058506610 on OpenAlexaff
Shengyong Yang, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthyleneChemistrySolvationPolymerizationChain propagationCatalysisChain terminationMolecular dynamicsPolymer chemistryComputational chemistryPolymerMoleculeOrganic chemistryRadical polymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combined Car−Parrinello and QM/MM dynamic simulations have been carried out in order to investigate the polymer chain propagation and termination processes in ethylene polymerization catalyzed by zirconocene with the counteranion [CH 3 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] - included. A complete account is given not only of the potential energy profile (PEP) but also of the free energy profile (FEP) for the first and second steps of ethylene insertion, as well as of the chain termination. Solvation effects were included on the basis of a continuum model. Special attention was given to the counteranion mobility in the catalytic process and the possible differences between PEP and FEP. Two different modes of attack by ethylene, cis and trans to the counteranion [CH 3 B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] -, were considered. In general, the FEPs differ from the PEPs in the barrier height and the shape. The FEP gives a higher barrier over PEP due to entropic contributions. The transition state of ethylene uptake by the metal center, the ethylene π-complex, and the ethylene insertion transition state are all clearly present on the FEPs. This is not always the case for the PEPs, especially for the trans pathway. The calculated FEPs for the chain propagation indicate that the cis pathway is preferred over the trans pathway for both the first and second insertions. For the energetically favorable cis pathway, the ethylene insertion into the Zr−C α bond rather than the ethylene uptake by the metal center is the rate-determining step for both PEP and FEP (with/without solvation effects included). Free dynamic simulations without any constraint on the process after ethylene insertion show that the counteranion can recoordinate to the metal center again in a period of less than 1 ps. In comparison with the estimated time scale of the chain propagation, the counteranion which was displaced by ethylene in the ethylene uptake process has sufficient time to recombine with [Cp 2 ZrR] + again before a new monomer approaches to the metal center. This is in good agreement with very recent experiments. The energetically most favorable pathway for the chain termination corresponds to the cis approach, with a free energy barrier of 18.5 kcal/mol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207