Field Chemical Flood Performance Comparison with Laboratory Displacement in Reservoir Core
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Field oil recovery performance of a mobility control chemical flood can be predicted by laboratory displacement tests. Four variations comparing field results with laboratory coreflood results are: 1.) A large polymer-flood pilot in S.W. Saskatchewan involving 5 injection wells and 13 production wells. 2.) An alkaline-polymer flood in Alberta with 25 wells of which 7 were injectors. 3.) A secondary application of alkaline-surfactant-polymer in a 6 production well, 1 injection well Wyoming reservoir. 4.) An alkaline-surfactant-polymer flood of 4 inverted 5-spots in a waterflooded Chinese field. The comparison of laboratory and field results is based on oil cut and oil recovery performance. Results of comparisons suggest that radial corefloods physically simulate oil recovery process in the field when properly scaled.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it