MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058544155 · doi:10.5539/jas.v4n11p102

Simple Sequence Repeat Molecular Marking Analysis of the Genetic Relationship between Zhaoqing Local Fine Citrus Breeds and Other Citrus and Allied Plants

2012· article· en· W2058544155 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qianhua Ji, Xiqin Zhou, Yanjun Guo, Liying Guo, Yaping Hu, Hui Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
KeywordsGermplasmBiologyPrimer (cosmetics)Molecular markerGenetic relationshipBotanyHorticultureGeneticsGenetic diversityGeneDemographyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genetic relationship between Zhaoqing local citrus breeds and other citrus and allied plants was studied using the simple sequence repeat (SSR) molecular marker technique. Among 34 pairs of citrus SSR primers, this study selected 13 primer pairs with high polymorphism to expand 83 bands with 100% polymorphism positive rate. Through cluster analysis, this study effectively differentiated the species, breeds, and even strains of citrus, poncitrus, and atalantia correa. Thus, SSR molecular marker techniques can adapt to the classification of the status research of local citrus germplasm resources. A close genetic relationship was found among Zhaoqing local citrus breeds. This study provided evidence that Citrus haniana Hort. ex Tseng Sihuihanggan is the female parent of C. nobilis Lour. gonggan by combining morphological and other molecular biology research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensFrench-language works237,207