Modeling the Forces Exerted on the Tool-Electrode During Spark Assisted Chemical Engraving Constant Velocity Feed-Drilling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spark Assisted Chemical Engraving (SACE) is an interesting technology for micro-machining several types of non-conductive materials like glass, quartz, polymers and some ceramics. The process takes place in an electrochemical cell with two electrodes immersed in an electrolyte. The electrolytic solution is typically sodium hydroxide (30%wt NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH). The cathode is used as tool and the anode as counter-electrode. When the applied voltage is higher than a critical value (typically around 30V, depending on the electrolyte and tool-electrode geometry) bubbles grow so dense on the electrode surface that they coalesce into a gas film. Electrical discharges occur between the electrode and the electrolyte. Machining begins consequently if the electrode is placed close enough to the surface to be machined (typically 25μm for glass). In the present paper, the forces exerted on the tool-electrode during constant velocity feed drilling is investigated experimentally and a model is proposed. The setup is composed of a machine head mounted on XYZ precision linear stage holding the tool-electrode. The machining head further incorporates a force sensor which is able to monitor, during drilling operation, the force exerted on the tool-electrode based on the zero displacement measurement principle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it