MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058567481 · doi:10.3917/riges.392.0005

Pierre Jeanniot : d'inventeur de la boîte noire à leader mondial de l'aviation

2014· article· fr· W2058567481 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jacqueline Cardinal

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceAir transportPhilosophyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pierre Jeanniot a été président et chef de la direction d’Air Canada de 1984 à 1990. D’abord simple technicien, il a gravi les échelons jusqu’à devenir président. On lui doit la conception de la boîte noire, telle qu’on la connaît aujourd’hui. Contre vents et marées, il a privatisé le transporteur aérien national après y avoir opéré un redressement spectaculaire. Il a ensuite dirigé la prestigieuse Association internationale du transport aérien (IATA) de 1993 à 2002, transformant le groupe de pression bureaucratique en un organisme influent et incontournable à l’échelle internationale. En reconnaissance de sa contribution exceptionnelle, l’IATA lui a octroyé le titre de directeur général émérite. Il est aujourd’hui président-directeur général de Jinmag inc., une société-conseil en gestion. Il est administrateur de sociétés et un conférencier recherché pour ses vues sur les enjeux actuels et futurs auxquels l’industrie aérienne fait face. Comment ce Montréalais d’adoption, arrivé sans le sou à Montréal avec sa mère à l’âge de 14 ans, a-t-il pu atteindre de tels sommets ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207