Isolation and Characterization of Skin-type, Type I Antifreeze Polypeptides from the Longhorn Sculpin, Myoxocephalus octodecemspinosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The antifreeze polypeptides (AFPs) are found in several marine fish and have been grouped into four distinct biochemical classes (type I-IV). Recently, the new subclass of skin-type, type I AFPs that are produced intracellularly as mature polypeptides have been identified in the winter flounder (Pleuronectes americanus) and the shorthorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus scorpius). This study demonstrates the presence of skin-type AFPs in the longhorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus octodecemspinosus), which produces type IV serum AFPs. Using polymerase chain reaction-based methods, a clone that encoded for a type I AFP was identified. The clone lacked a signal sequence, indicating that the mature polypeptide is produced in the cytosol. A recombinant protein was produced in Escherichia coli and antifreeze activity was characterized. Four individual Ala-rich polypeptides with antifreeze activity were isolated from the skin tissue. One polypeptide was completely sequenced by tandem MS. This study provides the first evidence of a fish species that produces two different biochemical classes of antifreeze proteins (type I and type IV), and enforces the notion that skin-type AFPs are a widespread biological phenomenon in fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".