Bibliographic record
Abstract
S'inspirant de la Dogmatique de Gérard Siegwalt, la présente se veut une réaction face à l'acosmisme théologique contemporain par le biais d'un questionnement touchant certaines de ses positions caractéristiques, en l'occurrence celles formulées par le groupe de l'Institut de recherches herméneutiques et systématiques de l'université de Neuchâtel dans le cadre d'une actualisation du projet bultmannien de démythologisation. Il ne s'agit pas ici d'évaluer la pertinence de ce projet qui insiste à juste titre sur le concept théorique d'existence, mais simplement de se pencher sur l'attitude intransigeante qu'il adopte face aux questions cosmologiques, et spécialement face à l'antique cosmogonie mythique. On cherchera ainsi à aller à l'encontre d'une approche réductrice du mythe cosmogonique qui ne voudrait voir en lui qu'une représentation purement fictive du monde " devenue obsolète ".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".