MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058751995 · doi:10.1093/imaman/dpq012

The covariance sign of transformed random variables with applications to economics and finance

2010· article· en· W2058751995 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Management Mathematics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovarianceSign (mathematics)Probabilistic logicMathematical economicsMathematical financeRepresentation (politics)EconomicsEconometricsRandom variableMonotonic functionMathematicsVariable (mathematics)FinanceStatisticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of problems in economics, finance and insurance rely on determining the sign of the covariance of two transformations of a random variable. The classical Chebyshev's inequality offers a powerful tool for solving the problem, but it assumes that the transformations are monotonic, which is not always the case in applications. For this reason, in the present paper, we establish new results for determining the covariance sign and provide further insights into the area. Unlike many previous works, our method of analysis, which is probabilistic in its nature, does not rely on the classical Höffding's representation of the covariance or on any of its numerous extensions and generalizations. We motivate our research with several problems arising in economics, finance and insurance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it