MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058769688 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5683

Calculations of Magnetic Moments for Three-Electron Atomic Systems

2001· article· en· W2058769688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZeeman effectAtomic physicsPhysicsLithium (medication)Excited stateMagnetic momentGround stateElectronElectron magnetic dipole momentIsotopes of lithiumRadiative transferIsotopeAtomic numberNeutron magnetic momentAnomalous magnetic dipole momentNuclear physicsMagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsMagnetic dipoleIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first fully correlated calculations of the magnetic moment in lithium are presented. Relative to the free-electron value, the Zeeman ${g}_{J}$ factor for the ground state lithium ${g}_{J}{/g}_{e}\ensuremath{-}1$ is calculated to a computational accuracy of 200 parts in ${10}^{9}$, including relativistic and radiative corrections of orders ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}^{2}$, ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}^{2}m/M$, and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}^{3}$. The isotope shifts in ${g}_{J}$ are predicted precisely for various isotopes. The extensions to the first excited $S$ state of lithium and the ground state of ${\mathrm{Be}}^{+}$ are made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it