Subaqueous eruption and shallow-water reworking of a small-volume Surtseyan edifice at Kakanui, New Zealand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kakanui volcaniclastic deposits on the South Island of New Zealand are the remnants of two late Eocene to early Oligocene Surtseyan-type cones. Eruptive-dominated material of the (i) stratified tuff and lapilli tuff, and (ii) lapilli tuff breccia lithofacies and post-eruptive debris of the (iii) shell-rich tuff and lapilli tuff, and (iv) chaotic and cross-bedded tuff and lapilli tuff lithofacies compose the deposits. The 9–250 m thick stratified tuff and lapilli tuff contains grain-flow deposits originating from low-volume tephra jets and local thinning and fining upward sequences that formed from density currents during sustained uprush. The lapilli tuff breccia, up to 4.5 m thick, contains inward-dipping beds deposited via debris flows along inner-cone walls. Burrows and articulated shells in the 2–4 m thick shell-rich tuff and lapilli tuff indicate volcanic quiescence and low sedimentation rates, whereas shell fragments upsection signal increased wave and current activity. Burrows, pyrite concretions, and mudstone in the lower part of the 26 m thick chaotic tuff and lapilli tuff indicate suspension deposition and cessation in pyroclastic volcanism. High-angle trough cross-beds and limestone rip-up fragments upsection are consistent with wave-induced current reworking. The depositional model involves a Surtseyan-type eruption on a continental shelf, followed by colonization of organisms on the tops of planed-off cones. The Kakanui deposits comprise a cluster of cones constituting part of a late Eocene – early Oligocene monogenetic volcanic field. The Kakanui succession provides an opportunity to study deposits that form from explosive subaqueous pyroclastic eruptions and wave-dominated deposition and erosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".