MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of <i>Phytophthora ilicis</i> causing twig blight on holly in Spain

2012· article· en· W2058828312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Pintos, Carlos Rial, O. Aguín, J. P. Mansilla

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSporangiumTwigBiologyPhytophthoraBlightAntheridiumBotanyPotato dextrose agarHorticultureCankerOosporeAgarSporeBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During Phytophthora ramorum monitoring surveys at nurseries, parks and public gardens, a range of ornamental plants susceptible to infection with Phytophthora were extensively surveyed. In 2011, during these surveys in Santiago de Compostela (Galicia, NW Spain), several holly plants (Ilex aquifolium) were observed exhibiting black leaf spots, defoliation, twig blight, cankers and shoot dieback. Excised tissue from the leading edge of lesions on twigs and stems was plated on V8 agar semi-selective medium (Erwin & Ribeiro, 1996) and incubated for four days at 20°C in the dark. A Phytophthora sp. was consistently isolated. This was transferred to carrot agar (CA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Fig. 1). Isolates exhibited optimal growth at 16-18°C and maximum growth at 25°C. Sporangia formed sympodially, were semipapillate, caducous with medium length pedicels 5-15 μm long (Fig. 2a) and had a length/width ratio of 1.2-1.6. Chlamydospores were not observed. Isolates were homothallic. Oogonia ranged from 17-27 μm in diameter (average 22.67 μm). Oospores were plerotic 14.6-23.6 μm in diameter (Fig. 2b-d). Antheridia were amphigynous, round, and occasionally elongated (Fig. 2b-d). Based on these morphological characters, cultures were identified as Phytophthora ilicis (Buddenhagen & Young, 1957). Identity was confirmed by DNA sequences analysis. DNA from isolates was extracted and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and translation elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1 alpha) gene regions were amplified using primers DC6, ITS4 and ITS6 (Cooke et al., 2000) and ELONGF1-ELONGR1 (Kroon et al., 2004). PCR amplicons were sequenced and deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. JQ609277 and JQ609278, respectively). Comparison of the sequences with others sequences available in GenBank showed 100% homology with those previously identified as P. ilicis (FJ8001947 and AY564127). A pathogenicity test of one representative isolate of P. ilicis was conducted using five detached stems of holly. A shallow wound was made with a scalpel on the middle of the stem. A 5 mm mycelial plug, from the margin of a seven-day-old culture growing on V8 agar, was inserted in every wound and sealed with Parafilm. The inoculated shoots were maintained at room temperature and 75% humidity. After 10 days stem blackened cankers and defoliation were observed (Fig. 3). Control stems, inoculated with sterile V8 agar, remained symptomless. P. ilicis was re-isolated from all inoculated stems but not from controls. To our knowledge this is the first report of Phytophthora ilicis causing leaf and twig blight on Ilex in Spain. P. ilicis is an invasive aerial Phytophthora characteristically found in cool temperate regions and it is host specific on holly. All cultivars of I. aquifolium are susceptible, although some other Ilex species and hybrids show resistance (Hall, 1991). P. ilicis was first reported and described in the western United States and is also recorded in Canada, U.K, the Netherlands and France.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207