Efficacy of Radioprotection in the Prevention of Radiation-Induced Craniofacial Bone Growth Inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been reported that radiotherapy-induced craniofacial deformities can occur in 66 to 100 percent of survivors of childhood head and neck cancers. Recent interest in the effectiveness of radioprotectors in the protection of normal tissue against radiation injury led us to investigate a possible role of radioprotection in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use the radioprotective agent amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721) as a probe to determine the effectiveness of radioprotection in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition after single-dose orthovoltage radiation to the infant rabbit orbital-zygomatic complex. Seven-week-old male New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into three groups (n = 10 each): group 1, 0 Gy (sham radiation); group 2, 35-Gy single-dose orthovoltage radiation; and group 3, 35-Gy single-dose orthovoltage radiation and amifostine (300 mg/kg intravenously, given 20 minutes before radiation). Serial radiographs and computed tomographic scans were obtained for cephalometric analysis, bone volume, and bone density measurements until skeletal maturity at 21 weeks. Significant (p < 0.05) reductions in orbital-zygomatic complex linear bone growth, bone volume, and bone density were observed after 35-Gy radiation compared with nonirradiated controls. No significant differences were noted between groups in cephalometric analysis of the nontreated (nonirradiated) left orbital-zygomatic complex, indicating no crossover effect from the radiation beam. However, pretreatment with amifostine, 20 minutes before 35-Gy radiation, resulted in significant (p < 0.05) preservation of linear bone growth, bone volume, and bone mineral density in the rabbit orbital-zygomatic complex compared with controls. This study demonstrated for the first time the effectiveness of a radioprotector in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition, and it paves the way for investigation into the pathogenic mechanism and prevention of radiotherapy-induced craniofacial deformities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".