MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058836530 · doi:10.1089/scd.2007.0170

Gene Signature of Stromal Cells which Support Dendritic Cell Development

2008· article· en· W2058836530 on OpenAlexaff
Geneviève Despars, Pravin Periasamy, Janice L. Abbey, Terence J. O’Neill, Helen C. O’Neill

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cells and Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyLymph node stromal cellStromal cellHaematopoiesisCD34Bone marrowCell biologyProgenitor cellStem cellImmunologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spleen stromal cells are critical determinants of dendritic cell (DC) development in spleen. The spleen stromal line, namely STX3, supports DC differentiation in vitro from overlaid bone marrow cells while the lymph node stromal line, namely 2RL22, does not. Here we have characterised the hematopoietic support capacity of each stroma, and analysed lineage origin of the stromal cell lines by gene profiling using microarrays. Stromal co-culture experiments were performed using bone marrow cells as a source of hematopoietic progenitors. A characteristic immature myeloid-like CD11c(+)CD11b(+)CD86(+)MHC-II(/lo)B220()CD8alpha() DC is produced after 14 days in STX3 cocultures, while 2RL22 cocultures produce only monocyte/macrophage-like cells. No other hematopoietic cell type is produced. The STX3 and 2RL22 stroma were compared by transcriptome analysis utilising Affymetrix Murine U74Av2 genechips to identify gene expression related to differential hematopoietic support function. Data mining was used to determine cell surface marker expression reflecting endothelial cells and fibroblasts, as well as adhesion molecules contributing to the microenvironment. STX3 shows gene expression reflective of early endothelial cells, while 2RL22 expresses markers specific to fibroblasts. The expression of genes like Flt1, CD34, Mcam, and Eng distinguishes STX3 as an early immature endothelial cell lacking markers of angioblasts or hemangioblasts like Tal1/SCL, Tie1, Tie2, Kdr or Prom1/AC133. The absence of expression of genes like Vwf and Cd31 distinguishes STX3 from fully differentiated vascular endothelial cells. In contrast, the 2RL22 lymph node stroma specifically expresses genes related to fibroblastic-like cells like osteoblasts with expression of Vdr (Vitamin D receptor), and epithelial cells with expression of Krt13 (keratins). Gene expression data identifies STX3 as splenic endothelial cells, independently able to support the outgrowth of immature, myeloid DC-like cells from progenitors present in bone marrow, while 2RL22 lymph node fibroblastic cells provide support for development of monocytes/macrophages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cells and DevelopmentSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207