MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058856109 · doi:10.1093/fs/kns009

Sounding the Virtual: Gilles Deleuze and the Theory and Philosophy of Music <i>Sounding the Virtual: Gilles Deleuze and the Theory and Philosophy of Music</i> . Edited by B <scp>rian</scp> H <scp>ulse</scp> and N <scp>ick</scp> N <scp>esbitt</scp> . Farnham: Ashgate, 2010. xvii + 288 pp., ill., mus. exx. Hb £65.00.

2012· article· en· W2058856109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCybernetics and Technology in Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyDepth soundingMusic theoryPhilosophy of musicCognitive sciencePhilosophyArtPsychologyMusic historyVisual artsCartographyMusicalGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Sounding the Virtual: Gilles Deleuze and the Theory and Philosophy of Music Get access Sounding the Virtual: Gilles Deleuze and the Theory and Philosophy of Music. Edited by Brian Hulse and Nick Nesbitt. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010. xvii + 288 pp., ill., mus. exx. Hb £65.00. Elizabeth Gould Elizabeth Gould University of Toronto e.gould@utoronto.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume 66, Issue 2, April 2012, Page 272, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/kns009 Published: 01 April 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.024
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it