MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2058870109 · doi:10.1139/apnm-2013-0447

Do childhood excess weight and family food insecurity share common risk factors in the local environment? An examination using a Quebec birth cohort

2013· article· en· W2058870109 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Megan Carter

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Body mass indexPsychologyCohortDemographyStructural equation modelingOdds ratioLongitudinal studyEnvironmental healthGeneralized estimating equationCohort studyGerontologyMedicineGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood excess weight and family food insecurity are food-system related public health problems that exist in Canada. Since both relate to issues of food accessibility, availability and utilization, which have elements of “place”, they may share common risk factors in the local environment that are amenable to intervention. In this area of research, the literature derives mostly from an American context, and there is a dearth of high-quality evidence, specifically from longitudinal studies. The main objectives of this thesis were to examine the adjusted associations between the place factors: material deprivation, social deprivation, social cohesion, disorder, and living location, with change in child body mass index (BMI) Z score and with change in family food insecurity status in a Canadian cohort of children. The Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development was used to meet the main objectives of this thesis. Response data from 6 collection cycles (4–10 years of age) were used in 3 main analyses. The first analysis examined change in child BMI Z score as a function of the place factors using mixed models regression. The second analysis examined change in child BMI Z score as a function of place factors using group-based trajectory modeling. The third and final analysis examined change in family food insecurity status as a function of the place factors using generalized estimating equations. Social deprivation, social cohesion and disorder were strongly and positively associated with family food insecurity, increasing the odds by 45%–76%. These place factors, on the other hand, were not consistently associated with child weight status. Material deprivation was not important for either outcome, except for a slight positive association in the mixed models analysis of child weight status. Living location was not important in explaining family food insecurity. On the other hand, it was associated with child weight status in both analyses, but the nature of the relationship is still unclear. Results do not suggest that addressing similar place factors may alleviate both child excess weight and family food insecurity. More high-quality longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to clarify relationships between the local environment and child weight status and family food insecurity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism→Same topicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations→French-language works237,207→