MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058893559 · doi:10.1089/end.2004.18.527

Results of Shockwave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Urolithiasis

2004· article· en· W2058893559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endourology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryUreteroscopyLithotripsyPopulationUrologyUreter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is widely practiced in the management of pediatric urolithiasis. However, the efficacy, need for ancillary procedures, and treatment-related complications are not as clearly defined as in the adult population. We reviewed the outcomes of SWL in the pediatric population at our lithotripsy unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients </=16 years of age treated with SWL between January 1991 and June 2002 was undertaken. One hundred patients with 115 stones underwent 131 SWL procedures (115 first treatments, 16 retreatments). The mean age was 10.7 years (range 10 months-16 years). Stone locations were as follows: caliceal 42.6%, renal pelvic 27%, and ureteral (30.4%). The mean stone size was 7.8 mm (range 2-23 mm). Risk factors for stone formation, the need for secondary therapies, and treatment-related complications were noted. The stone-free rate for a single-session SWL procedure, defined as complete absence of stone fragments on plain film, intravenous urography, or renal ultrasonography, was calculated based on 3-month follow-up. The efficiency quotient (EQ) was also calculated. RESULTS: Risk factors were identified in 31 children (27.0%), including metabolic and anatomic abnormalities. Patients with a risk factor were less likely to be stone free after one SWL session than those without risk factors (31.7% v 64.7%; P < 0.001). General (74.8%), neurolept (24.4%), and epidural (0.8%) anesthesia were utilized. Ureteral stents were placed in 25% of treatments. There were no intraoperative complications. Minor complications were seen in 4.6% of patients. Ancillary procedures were required in 10 patients. Following initial SWL treatment, 60.2% of patients were stone free. The retreatment rate was 13.9%. Following a second treatment, the stone-free rate increased to 68%. The EQ was 54.3. CONCLUSION: Employing a strict definition of treatment success, single-session SWL in our series offers moderate efficacy in the pediatric population. Patients who have a large stone or risk factor such as an anatomic abnormality are less likely to become stone free and might better undergo an endourologic procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it