Older Women's Experiences of a Fitness Program: The Importance of Social Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By means of a phenomenological case study, the meaning of a group fitness program to older women who lived alone was described. Nine women, aged 67 to 83 years old (mean age 75) who were enrolled in a group fitness program shared their motivation to attend, the social and health benefits they received, and the significance of connecting weekly with women their own age. The analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews and artifact documentation resulted in three themes (a) trading roles, (b) a happier me, and (c) it's our program. As single women the participants recognized that engaging in a fitness program provided a social context in which to expand networks that dwindled due to changes in family responsibilities. They also took great pride in taking responsibility for their own wellness through exercise. The meanings of the experiences were interpreted with the support of Weiss' (1973) theoretical framework on social support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it