Effective capacity optimization based on overlay cognitive radio network in gamma fading environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditionally, the frequency spectrum is licensed to users who have the exclusive right to access the allocated band. However, an unlicensed (cognitive) user may share a frequency band with a licensed (primary) owner as long as the interference is below a certain threshold. This makes capacity analysis a critical important issue in these networks. Lots of research on cognitive radio (CR) networking have now focused on the satisfaction of quality-of-service (QoS) demands for cognitive users (CU). In this paper, we study how the delay QoS requirements affect the dynamic spectrum access (DSA) strategy on network performance. We treat the delay-QoS in interference constrained cognitive radio network by applying the effective capacity concept, focusing on one of the dominant DSA schemes: overlay. Optimal power allocation scheme is obtained. This scheme considers the transmit-power/interference-power constraints and the primary user activity. Performance analysis and numerical evaluations demonstrate the proposed effective capacity optimization on the DSA overlay scheme. The impact of delay QoS requirements and other related parameters are evaluated as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".