Pullout resistance of single and double nails in a model sandbox
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pullout tests on single and double soil nails were conducted in a model sandbox. The test parameters included variations in the surface roughness, the ratio of nail length to nail diameter, the overburden pressure, and the distance between two nails. The characteristic of a single asperity, the asperity number per unit length, and the ratio of the thread depth to the soil particle size were used to define the surface roughness factor. The test results showed that the apparent friction coefficients at the soilnail interface were dependent upon the surface roughness of the nail. Group efficiency was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a nail when installed within a group. The test results showed that the group efficiency of a double-nail system was dependent upon the surface roughness factor and has a linear relationship with the nail distance until 100% efficiency is reached. The minimum required distance for 100% efficiency also varied with the surface roughness factor.Key words: apparent friction coefficient, group efficiency, pullout test, surface roughness factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it