The Electrochemical Response of Preoxidized Copper in Aqueous Sulfide Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conversion of a Cu 2 O film on copper to Cu 2 S in aqueous sulfide solutions has been followed using a combination of electrochemical techniques and in situ Raman spectroscopy. Oxide films were electrochemically grown in alkaline solutions and their composition and morphology determined using Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Although corrosion potential measurements indicate that the aqueous sulfide solution rapidly penetrates the porous Cu 2 O layer, the oxide-to-sulfide reaction appears to proceed chemically at the oxide/solution interface rather than via the galvanic coupling of Cu oxidation to Cu 2 S and Cu 2 O reduction to Cu. In situ Raman spectroscopy confirms that the sulfide formed is Cu 2 S , and cathodic stripping voltammetry shows that the reaction is initially rapid and then proceeds at a constant rate until the conversion is complete. Comparison of the amounts of oxide initially present and sulfide eventually formed demonstrates that the conversion is 100% efficient. These studies are part of a larger project to determine the important corrosion processes on copper high-level nuclear waste containers exposed to anoxic aqueous sulfide containing groundwaters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".