Long-Term Follow-Up of the First Patients to Undergo Transcatheter Alcohol Septal Ablation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe the 10-year outcome of the first-in-human series of 12 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with alcohol septal ablation. There was no 30-day mortality. Survival free of death, internal cardiac defibrillator discharge for treatment of ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, severe New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV and/or Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III/IV symptoms and the need for surgical myectomy in this cohort was 91% at 1 year and 73% at 10 years. The reduction in outflow tract gradient was maintained over the 10 years, from a mean preoperative gradient of 70 mm Hg to a median of 3 mm Hg at 126 months of follow-up (p < 0.01). Two patients (16%) underwent a further ablation procedure. Two patients (16%) suffered sudden cardiac death, 91 and 102 months after the procedure. Long-term symptom benefit was experienced by all patients, with a reduction in mean NYHA class from 2.7 +/- 0.6 before the procedure to 1 after the procedure at the last follow-up (p < 0.01). This historic small cohort study demonstrates that septal ablation can provide long-term haemodynamic and symptomatic benefit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".