MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058949845 · doi:10.1115/fedsm2012-72316

Assessment of the Hydrodynamic Boundary Condition at Open-Porous Interface Using Pore-Level Flow Simulations

2012· article· en· W2058949845 on OpenAlexafffund
Aydin Nabovati, Cristina H. Amon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsLattice Boltzmann methodsPorosityBoundary value problemMechanicsPorous mediumMaterials sciencePenetration (warfare)Interface modelSlip (aerodynamics)Interface (matter)Penetration depthThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysicsComputer scienceOpticsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we follow the pore-level flow simulation approach to investigate fluid flow over an open-porous interface using the lattice Boltzmann method. As this approach does not require any specific treatment for the interface, its results can be used to evaluate the current macroscopic boundary conditions for the interface. The Beavers & Joseph boundary condition is evaluated and the value of slip coefficient is presented as a function of porosity of the porous region. Analytical solution of the velocity profile in the close vicinity of the interface is used to predict the penetration depth. The predicted numerical results for porous penetration depth are in excellent agreement with those predicted from the analytical solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207