Cooperative multi-vehicle search and coverage problem in uncertain environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A decentralized approach is proposed to solve a cooperative multi-vehicle search and coverage problem in uncertain environments. Two different types of vehicle are used for search and coverage tasks. The search vehicles have a priori probability maps of targets in the environment and they update these maps based on the measurement of their sensors during the search mission. They use a limited look-ahead dynamic programming algorithm to find their own path individually while their objective is to maximize the amount of information gathered by the whole team. The task of service vehicles is to spread out over the environment to optimally cover the terrain. A locational optimization technique is used to assign Voronoi regions to vehicles and the stability of coverage system is guaranteed using LaSalle's invariance principle. The service vehicles modify their configuration using the updated probability maps which are provided by the search vehicles. Simulations show that the proposed approach offers improved performance compared to conventional coverage methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it