MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2058969413 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.12215

Amazing flow rate for an amazing meeting! Niagara 2013

2012· article· en· W2058969413 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
J.L. Chin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For my first communication as the 68th Canadian Urological Association President to our membership and the CUAJ readership, I want to express my heartfelt thanks to the CUA members and Executives for bestowing on me the honour and privilege to serve the CUA. I also wish to congratulate Dr. Michael Chetner and his team for guiding the CUA through a very successful year and for orchestrating a superb Annual Meeting in a spectacular venue in the Rockies. Aside from organizing the Annual Meeting, the CUA is now a “well-oiled machine” with several components, working synergistically to serve our members year-round, thanks to the effort of my predecessors and their executive leadership teams. These individuals have established a highly efficient Corporate Office, an Office of Education which organizes numerous successful educational events yearly, and several effective standing committees with member- and patient-oriented mandates, all run by talented and devoted CUA members. Last but not least, CUAJ is an essential component of our Association, thanks to the herculean efforts of our founding, and now out-going, Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Laurence Klotz. On behalf of the CUA membership, I offer Dr. Klotz our sincere thanks for his vision, his tenacity and his dedication to the enterprise, which he has single-handedly transformed into a success story: an indexed national Urologic Journal with a rapidly rising impact factor. It is with great pleasure that I announce the designation of Dr. Klotz as Emeritus Editor-in Chief. We will appreciate Laurie’s experience and sage advice for our Journal going forward. I shall close by requesting that you block off your calendar on June 22–25, 2013, for our 68th Annual Meeting in Niagara Falls, Ontario. As one of the most iconic places in the world, Niagara Falls has an amazing flow rate of 200,000 cubic feet per second, rendering it the most fitting venue for our Meeting. We promise you an excellent scientific program chaired by Drs. Jonathan Izawa and Anil Kapoor, with Dr. Patrick Walsh and Dr. Francesco Montorsi already confirmed as our guest speakers. Our Local Organizing Co-chairs, Drs. Ian Brown and Dianne Heritz, will help to show-case all the world-class cultural and historic attractions in the Region. Bring the entire family to experience what Samuel de Champlain discovered in 1604, what H.G. Wells and Pierre Berton wrote about, and what Marilyn Monroe and Superman saw in the movies!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5740.415

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association Journal→Same topicClinical practice guidelines implementation→French-language works237,207→