Reaction of the C<sub>2</sub>H Radical with 1-Butyne (C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>6</sub>): Low-Temperature Kinetics and Isomer-Specific Product Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rate coefficient for the reaction of the ethynyl radical (C(2)H) with 1-butyne (H-C[triple bond]C-CH(2)-CH(3)) is measured in a pulsed Laval nozzle apparatus. Ethynyl radicals are formed by laser photolysis of acetylene (C(2)H(2)) at 193 nm and detected via chemiluminescence (C(2)H + O(2) --> CH (A(2)Delta) + CO(2)). The rate coefficients are measured over the temperature range of 74-295 K. The C(2)H + 1-butyne reaction exhibits no barrier and occurs with rate constants close to the collision limit. The temperature-dependent rate coefficients can be fit within experimental uncertainties by the expression k = (2.4 +/- 0.5) x 10(-10)(T/295 K)(-(0.04+/-0.03)) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1). Reaction products are detected at room temperature (295 K) and 533 Pa using a multiplexed photoionization mass spectrometer (MPIMS) coupled to the tunable vacuum ultraviolet synchrotron radiation from the Advanced Light Source at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Two product channels are identified for this reaction: m/z = 64 (C(5)H(4)) and m/z = 78 (C(6)H(6)) corresponding to the CH(3)-loss and H-loss channels, respectively. Photoionization efficiency (PIE) curves are used to analyze the isomeric composition of both product channels. The C(5)H(4) products are found to be exclusively linear isomers composed of ethynylallene and methyldiacetylene in a 4:1 ratio. In contrast, the C(6)H(6) product channel includes two cyclic isomers, fulvene 18(+/-5)% and 3,4-dimethylenecyclobut-1-ene (DMCB) 32(+/-8)%, as well as three linear isomers, 2-ethynyl-1,3-butadiene 8(+/-5)%, 3,4-hexadiene-1-yne 28(+/-8)%, and 1,3-hexadiyne 14(+/-5)%. Within experimental uncertainties, we do not see appreciable amounts of benzene and an upper limit of 10% is estimated. Diacetylene (C(4)H(2)) formation via the C(2)H(5)-loss channel is also thermodynamically possible but cannot be observed due to experimental limitations. The implications of these results for modeling of planetary atmospheres, especially of Saturn's largest moon Titan and the relationships to combustion reactions, are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".