Rhogocytes in gastropod larvae: developmental transformation from protonephridial terminal cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rhogocytes, terminal cells of protonephridia, and podocytes of metanephridial systems share an architectural feature that creates an apparent sieving device. The sieve serves to ultrafilter body fluid during the excretion and osmoregulation process carried out by nephridial systems, but its function in rhogocytes is unclear. Rhogocytes are molluscan hemocoelic cells that appear to have various functions related to metabolism of metal ions, including synthesis of hemocyanin in some gastropods and metal detoxification in pteriomorph bivalves. A hypothesis that proposed developmental and possibly evolutionary conversion between protonephridial terminal cells and rhogocytes has never been further explored; indeed, information on the occurrence of rhogocytes in molluscan developmental stages is meager. We used transmission electron microscopy to show that rhogocytes are present within larvae of eight species of gastropods sampled from the three major gastropod clades with a feeding larval stage in the life history. In larvae of a heterobranch gastropod, a rhogocyte was located next to each terminal cell of a pair of protonephridia that flanked the foregut, whereas all six species of caenogastropod larvae and a neritimorph larva that we examined had rhogocytes, but no protonephridia, in this location. We did not find ring‐shaped profiles of hemocyanin decamers within rhogocytes of larvae or pre‐hatch embryos. Rhogocytes in newly released larvae of Nerita melanotragus contained orderly bundles of cylinders, but the diameter of the cylinders was only 70% of the diameter typical of hemocyanin multidecamers. By examining embryos of the caenogastropod Nassarius mendicus at four successive developmental time points that bracketed the occurrence of larval hatching, we found that terminal cells from non‐functional protonephridia in pre‐hatch embryos transformed into rhogocytes around the time of hatching. This empirical evidence of ontogenetic transformation of protonephridial terminal cells into rhogocytes might be interpreted as developmental recapitulation of an evolutionary transition that occurred early in molluscan history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".