The design of spherical multilobe-cam mechanisms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cam—roller mechanisms can be used in transmissions and robotic devices as an alternative to their bevel-gear counterparts. As bevel gears are used to couple shafts of intersecting axes, their cam-mechanism replacements are bound to have intersecting axes as well. This means that the contact surface of the cam must be conical, which leads to spherical cam mechanisms. Compared with gear transmissions, cam—roller mechanisms feature low friction, low backlash, and high strength. However, cam mechanisms may end up with a high pressure angle if negative action, a motion in which the cam is driven by mechanism rollers, occurs. This article reports the design of transmissions with spherical multilobe cams (MLCs), as a means to reduce the pressure angle. The kinematics of MLC, including profile generation, undercutting-avoidance, and transmission-quality evaluation, is studied here. A case study has been included, in which the synthesis of a spherical MLC transmission is undertaken as a means to improve the transmission quality of a spherical epicyclic gear train. This train was introduced with the purpose of producing a singularity-free, unlimited-workspace pitch—roll wrist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it