Extension of holomorphic maps between real hypersurfaces of different dimension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we extend the results on analytic continuation of germs of holomorphic mappings from a real analytic hypersurface to a real algebraic hypersurface to the case when the target hypersurface is of higher dimension than the source. More precisely, we prove the following: Let M be a connected smooth real analytic minimal hypersurface in C n , M ′ be a compact strictly pseudoconvex real algebraic hypersurface in C N , 1 < n ≤ N . Suppose that f is a germ of a holomorphic map at a point p in M and f ( M ) is in M ′ . Then f extends as a holomorphic map along any smooth C R -curve on M with the extension sending M to M ′ . Further, if D and D ′ are smoothly bounded domains in C n and C N respectively, 1 < n ≤ N , the boundary of D is real analytic, and the boundary of D ′ is real algebraic, and if f : D → D ′ is a proper holomorphic map which admits a smooth extension to a neighbourhood of a point p in the boundary of D , then the map f extends continuously to the closure of D , and the extension is holomorphic on a dense open subset of the boundary of D .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".