MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059067639 · doi:10.1109/mci.2007.353415

Technology review - Biometrics-Technology, Application, Challenge, and Computational Intelligence Solutions

2007· article· en· W2059067639 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsComputer scienceFingerprint (computing)Fingerprint recognitionFace (sociological concept)Facial recognition systemArtificial intelligenceComputer securityHuman–computer interactionData sciencePattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biometrics is the science of the measurement of unique human characteristics, both physical and behavioral. Various biometric technologies are available for identifying or verifying an individual by measuring fingerprint, hand, face, signature, voice, or a combination of these traits. This paper aims to assist readers as they consider biometric solutions by examining common biometric technologies, introducing different biometric applications, and reviewing recent CI solutions presented at the 2006 IEEE WCCI

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.015
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it