MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leaving It Up to the Imagination: POV Shots and Imagining from the Inside

2005· article· en· W2059093334 on OpenAlexaff
Jinhee Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmusementNarrativeCharacter (mathematics)ArtNothingAestheticsReading (process)FeelingTheme parkVisual artsLiteratureHistoryPsychologyPhilosophySocial psychologyLinguisticsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Strolling in a desolate amusement park on a winter developed in her book Reading with Feeling, evening] that our aesthetic appreciation of fiction Brand: I always liked the place [the amusement park] contains a temporal dimension, which is in fact at this time of year. constrained by the trajectory of the narration Lisa: Perhaps you prefer to imagine what it will be in process.5 Similarly, for Smith, POV shotsthe spring. Because if it is already spring, there is although he carefully avoids linking POV shots nothing to imagine. directly to character identification-are one of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aesthetics and Art CriticismSame topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207