MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059101926 · doi:10.1063/1.4775808

Coherent control of radiationless transitions: Simultaneous excitation and decay of overlapping resonances

2013· article· en· W2059101926 on OpenAlexafffund
Timur Grinev, Moshe Shapiro, Paul Brumer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCoherent controlExcitationExcited stateDissociation (chemistry)Atomic physicsDiatomic moleculeObservableWave packetResonance (particle physics)LaserChemistryMoleculeMolecular physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a simple analytical theory for the study of coherent control of radiationless transitions, and in particular, internal conversion leading to dissociation, in molecules possessing overlapping resonances. The method is applied to a model diatomic system. In contrast to previous studies, we consider here the control of a molecule that is allowed to decay during and after the preparation process. We use this theory to derive the shape of the laser pulse that creates the specific excited wave packet that best enhances or suppresses the radiationless transitions process. The results show the importance of resonance overlap in the molecule in order to achieve efficient coherent control over radiationless transitions via laser excitation. Specifically, resonance overlap is proven to be crucial in order to alter interference contributions to the controlled observable, and hence to achieve efficient coherent control by varying the phase of the laser field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207