MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of the mitochondrion in plant responses to biotic stress

2006· article· en· W2059122130 on OpenAlexafffund
Sasan Amirsadeghi, Christine A. Robson, Greg C. Vanlerberghe

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiologia Plantarum · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMitochondrionCell biologyReactive oxygen speciesOxidative stressBiologyRetrograde signalingProgrammed cell deathBiochemistryApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies suggest that the plant mitochondrion may play a role during biotic stress responses, such as those occurring during incompatible plant–pathogen interactions. There are indications that signal molecules or pathways initiated by such interactions may directly or indirectly target mitochondrial components and that an important consequence of this targeting is an early disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis, resulting in an increased generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mROS). These mROS may then initiate further mitochondrial dysfunction and further mROS generation in a self‐amplifying manner. The mROS, as well as the graded dysfunction of the mitochondrion may act as cellular signals that initiate graded cellular responses ranging from defense gene induction to initiation of programmed cell death. However, these events may be attenuated by the unique components of the plant electron transport chain that act to substitute for dysfunctional components, dampen mROS generation or facilitate in defining the cellular level of ROS and antioxidant defense systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologia PlantarumSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207