MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059133048 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.195301

Prepositioned single quantum dot in a lateral electric field

2008· article· en· W2059133048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural SciencesUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsExcitonPhysicsQuantum dotElectric fieldStark effectQuantum-confined Stark effectCoulombElectronAtomic physicsCondensed matter physicsField (mathematics)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the effect of a lateral electric field on the optical properties of a single deterministically positioned InAs/InP quantum dot. We show experimentally that the ground-state excitonic Stark shift is significantly reduced in comparison with the single-particle picture and that the lateral electric field introduces a new previously forbidden optical transition. Results of full configuration-interaction calculations show that the Coulomb interactions of electrons and holes are modified by the electric field leading to the compensation of the single-particle Stark shift. The calculations also account for the appearance of the field-activated optical transition as an excitonic recombination event. The comparison of exciton and predicted charged exciton spectra allows us to exclude the presence of charged exciton complexes within the measured emission spectra. The ability to precisely position a single quantum dot and demonstrate control over the electronic properties of such a dot is expected to find application in scalable techniques for quantum information science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it