The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Colorectal surgery is associated with postoperative ileus, which contributes to delayed discharge. This study was designed to investigate the effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia on gastrointestinal function after colorectal surgery under standardized controlled postoperative care. METHODS: Forty-two patients diagnosed with either colonic cancer, diverticulitis, polyps, or adenoma, and scheduled for elective colorectal surgery, were randomly assigned to either postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine (n = 21) or epidural analgesia with a mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl (n = 21). Postoperative early oral feeding and assistance to mobilization were offered to all patients. Pain visual analog scale (1-100 mm), passage of flatus and bowel movements, length of hospital stay, and readiness for discharge were recorded. RESULTS: Pain visual analog scale (visual analog scale, 1-100 mm) at rest, on coughing, and daily on mobilization was significantly lower in the epidural group compared with the patient-controlled analgesia group. Median values for the visual analog scale group were 7 (95 percent confidence interval, 2-18) mm, 19 (95 percent confidence interval, 4-38) mm, and 10 (95 percent confidence interval, 5-33) mm, respectively, and, for the patient-controlled analgesia group, were 24 (95 percent confidence interval, 18-51) mm, 59 (95 percent confidence interval, 33-74) mm, and 40 (95 percent confidence interval, 29-79) mm, respectively (P < 0.01). Intake of protein and calories and time out of bed were similar in both groups. Mean time intervals +/- standard deviation from surgery to first flatus and first bowel movement occurred earlier in the epidural group, 1.9 +/- 0.6 days and 3.1 +/- 1.7 days, respectively, compared with patient-controlled analgesia, 3.6 +/- 1.5 days and 4.6 +/- 1.6 days, respectively (P < 0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in 33 percent of the patient-controlled analgesia group and 28 percent of the epidural group. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups with a mean of 7.3 +/- 3.7 days in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 8.5 +/- 4.2 days in the epidural group. Readiness for discharge was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia has distinct advantages over patient-controlled analgesia morphine in providing superior quality of analgesia and shortening the duration of postoperative ileus. However, discharge home was not faster, indicating that other perioperative factors influence the length of hospital stay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".