MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059171219 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.120255

Should We Consider Tumor Necrosis Factor as the Only Target in Spondyloarthritides?

2012· review· en· W2059171219 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Elisa Gremese

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheumatology Supplement · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTumor necrosis factor alphaInflammationBlockadeImmunologySacroiliitisBioinformaticsCancer researchArthritisInternal medicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the biology of inflammation occurring at the entheseal-bone insertion has led to a better knowledge of the main drivers of inflammation in spondyloarthropathies. The clinical efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blockers strongly supports the idea that TNF-α is a key molecule. Yet 40% of patients do not respond appropriately, indicating that other pathways are likely involved in these illnesses. Targeting T cells through a blockade of costimulating (CD28) molecules does not help, and in experimental models of sacroiliitis, targeting interleukin 6 (IL-6) did not provide any useful evidence. Immunohistological and functional data suggest that B cells, Th17, or IL-17A might be important, and indeed preliminary data concerning drugs targeting B cells and IL-17A seem to suggest clinical benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rheumatology SupplementSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207